Legal Opinion

In re Russell

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 1, 1984No. 83-1039PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

R.C 2151.02(A) defines a “delinquent child” as one “[w]ho violates any law of this state * * * which would be a crime if committed by an adult * * *.” (Emphasis added.) Therefore, it is not relevant to the finding of delinquency whether the actions of appellant would have constituted a felony or a misdemeanor if committed by an adult. The determination of the degree of the offense is, however, relevant to the issue of disposition.

R.C. 2151.355, which authorizes various dispositions of delinquent children, provided at the time applicable herein, in part:

*305“(A) If a child is found by the court to…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re Kitzmiller, Unpublished Decision (9-4-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. In Re HayesOhio Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. In re the Welfare of L.G.S.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
  4. State v. BlognaOhio Court of Appeals · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API