Legal Opinion
Rose v. Bartle
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided July 22, 1988No. Civ. A. 86-6255PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
GILES, District Judge.
Plaintiff claims that criminal charges relating to “macing” instituted against him by the District Attorney of Montgomery County in November, 1983, following a recommendation of an investigating grand jury, violated his federally protected constitutional rights, state common law rights and statutory rights cognizable under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, 18 U.S.C. 1961, et seq. (RICO). Joseph Rose, formerly Chief Deputy Sheriff of the Montgomery County Sheriffs Department, has sued the former District Attorney, Joseph A. Smyth, Jr.,…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Rose v. BartleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- American Express Travel Related Services Co. v. KentuckyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- Palumbo v. I.M. Simon & Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1988
- Cross v. MeiselDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
- Penn v. Alamo Rent-A-Car, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.