Legal Opinion

In Re the Marriage of Healy

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 19, 1983No. 5290-7-IIIPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMunson, J.

Jay B. Healy appeals the trial court's increased award of support. Mr. Healy does not challenge the court's finding of a substantial change of circumstances but contends the award is "not reasonable." We affirm.

The marriage of Jay and RaNae Healy was dissolved May 11, 1976. Mrs. Healy was given custody of their four sons, Eric, Jeffrey, Forrest, and Ryan. Their present ages are 22, 18, 14 and 11, respectively. Mr. Healy was ordered to provide $500 per month support for the four boys, to run to age 19 or emancipation.

Subsequent to the decree, Eric left home and Jeffrey began living with his…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Streater v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
  2. Thomas v. FrenchWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Friedlander v. FriedlanderWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Lambert v. LambertWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Schafer v. SchaferWashington Supreme Court · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Boyles v. Department of Retirement SystemsWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Arthur West v. Port Of TacomaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
  3. Boyles v. Department of Retirement SystemsWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Elizabeth Robbins v. Samuel ValdezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  5. In Re The Marriage Of: Bandana Waikhom, V John LuckwitzCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API