Legal Opinion

Ex parte Chin Own

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided February 2, 1917No. 3513PublishedCited by 1 opinion

In the matter of the application of Chin Own, father, and Chin Gow, son, for a writ of habeas corpus.

1Opinion of the Court

NETERFR, District Judge.

The petitioners, Chin Own and Chin Gow, are held by the Commissioner of Immigration under an order of deportation issued by the Secretary of Labor, and present a petition for a writ of habeas corpus — Chin Own alleging that he is a native-born citizen of the United States, returning after a temporary absence in China, and that Chin Gow is his son, born in China, and is coming *392to this country with the father, and that they are denied permission to enter; that they are deprived of their liberty without due process of law, and were denied a fair hearing by the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. The Japanese Immigrant CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. United States v. Ju ToySupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  3. Chin Yow v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  4. Pearson v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  5. United States v. Jung Ah LungSupreme Court of the United States · 1888

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hee Fuk Yuen v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API