Legal Opinion

Ligon v. City of Gadsden

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided March 23, 1926No. 7 Div. 161PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRice, J.

The sole question in controversy on this appeal is the validity, vel non, of an ordinance, regularly enacted, of the city of Gadsden in the following language:

“Any person who plays in any game of chance- or hazard for money or other valuable things, or who in any way aids or abets, countenances or encourages such game, must, on conviction, be fined not less than one and not more than one hundred dollars.”

The decisions governing are in conflict, and more or less difficult to reconcile.

The ordinance here involved is manifestly inconsistent with the general laws of the state, and it was not the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dunn v. Court of County RevenuesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1887
  2. Town of Greensboro v. EhrenreichSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886
  3. Ward v. MarksteinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  4. City of Bessemer v. EidgeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  5. Town of Livingston v. ScruggsAlabama Court of Appeals · 1922

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  2. Atkins v. City of Tarrant CityCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1979
  3. Leu v. City of Mountain BrookCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1980
  4. DISPOS. SOLUTIONS-LANDFILL v. Town of LowndesboroCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2002
  5. Town of Boaz v. JenkinsAlabama Court of Appeals · 1946

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API