Legal Opinion
In re the Estate of Pearsall
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided June 15, 1915PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Peoceedings for the construction of the will of the testatrix.
1Opinion of the Court
Cohalan, S.
Upon this accounting the will of the above named testatrix is before the court for construction. By the tenth paragraph thereof the testatrix provided as follows :
“ X. I give and bequeath to my executor or executors the sum of thirty thousand dollars in trust, the income thereof to be applied to the sole use and benefit of my nephew, Uathaniel *156Coles Pearsall, during his life, and at his death I give and bequeath the said sum of thirty thousand dollars to Thomas Pearsall and Helen Pearsall, children of James B. Pearsall, share and share alike. In case the said ISTathaniel Coles…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Savage v. . BurnhamNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
- Connelly v. . O'BrienNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
- Moffett v. . ElmendorfNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
- In Re the Final Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of WellsNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Reynolds v. . RobinsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re the Estate of McCaffertyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1932
- In re the Final Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of NeydorffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
- In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of ArmbrusterNew York Surrogate's Court · 1923