Legal Opinion

Arnold v. Olathe, Kansas, City of

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided January 16, 2020No. 2:18-cv-02703Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS MARK ARNOLD, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 18-2703-CM CITY OF OLATHE, KANSAS, et al., Defendants. ORDER Defendants City of Olathe and individual Olathe police officers (“the Olathe Defendants”) have filed a motion (ECF No. 92) seeking to compel supplementary discovery responses from the plaintiff, Mark Arnold. Plaintiff opposes the motion to compel, arguing he has provided complete answers to the discovery.1 For the reasons discussed below, the court grants the motion. Background Plaintiff, acting as special administrator of the estate of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Moses v. HalsteadDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2006
  2. Cardenas v. Dorel Juvenile Group, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2005
  3. Williams v. Sprint/United Management Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API