Legal Opinion
Jinks v. Advanced Protection Systems, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Texas
Decided April 4, 2001No. 3:99-cv-02862PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
FITZWATER, District Judge.
Plaintiff Lorraine Jinks (“Jinks”) sues defendant Advanced Protection Systems, Inc., d/b/a Centex HomeTeam Security (“Centex”) contending that Centex violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., the Texas Commission on Human Rights Act (“TCHRA”), Tex. Labor Code Ann. §§ 21.001-21.405 (Vernon 1996 & Supp. 2001), and 42 U.S.C. § 1981 by denying her two promotions based on her African-American race. 1 Centex moves for summary judgment. 2 For the reasons that follow, the court grants the motion…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Wright v. WestSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- El Paso Independent School District v. Richard R. Ex Rel R.R.District Court, W.D. Texas · 2008
- Green v. Medco Health Solutions of Texas, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2013
- Wood v. ChertoffDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2007