Legal Opinion
Park v. Park
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided November 12, 1941No. 10022PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.
The suit was by appellees against their guardian and his sureties to recover $13,-580.59,1 notwithstanding releases given him by them after their majority, and his discharge by judgments of the Court of Ordinary. The claim was that the releases and the discharges were procured by fraud.
Urging that the suit was a collateral attack upon the judgment of a probate court, defendants moved to dismiss it for want of jurisdiction. For their defenses to the merits, they set up; the releases and the judgments of the Court of Ordinary; specifically and fully denied the charges…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. ThrockmortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Payne v. HookSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Marshall v. HolmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Arrowsmith v. GleasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Poullain v. PoullainSupreme Court of Georgia · 1886
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Griffith v. Bank of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- Miller v. McNamaraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
- Bostwick v. Baldwin Drainage Dist.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1943
- The Maccabees v. City of North ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1942
- Farrington v. JacobsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1943