Legal Opinion

Newsom v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 18, 1942No. 21944Published

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

KRUEGER, Judge.

The State has filed an elaborate motion for rehearing in which it contends that we erred in holding the State’s witness Finley to be an accomplice as a matter of law. We have again reviewed his testimony, the material and pertinent parts of which are correctly set out in the original opinion, and are firmly convinced that Finley, by his testimony, has shown himself to be an accomplice as a matter of law.

In the case of Johnson v. State, 58 Tex. Cr. R. 244, a question similar to the one under consideration was presented. In that case it appears that some…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
  2. Chandler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
  3. Cummings v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API