Albert v. Hoffman
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Appeal by the defendant William Hoffman from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, rendered in the Municipal Court of the city of Hew-York, second district, borough of Manhattan.
1Opinion of the CourtMacLean, J.
The plaintiff, in her complaint, declares on a check made'by defendant Hoffman, directing the East ¡River Rational, Bank to pay to the order of H. Feinberg & Son, on Rovember 10, 1908, the sum of $364, and that the defendants H. Feinberg & Son duly indorsed and delivered same to the plaintiff for value, but that payment was stopped by the maker before presentation, and no part, although duly demanded, has been paid. The defendant Hoffman denies that he delivered the same for value to the payee of the check, and also denies that the plaintiff became a holder in due course and for value,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Saltus & Saltus v. EverettNew York Supreme Court · 1838
- Barnard v. . CampbellNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Mayer v. . HeidelbachNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Hyde v. ElleryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1862
- McGraw v. SolomonMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Triphonoff v. SweeneyOregon Supreme Court · 1913
- National Currency Exchange, Inc. v. PerkinsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1964
- Currie-McGraw Co. v. FriedmanMississippi Supreme Court · 1924
- Marba v. WarrenCity of New York Municipal Court · 1947
- Dousmanis v. Colonial BankAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1929
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.