Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Frank IX & Sons

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 7, 1978No. 46PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

This appeal comes to us under N.C. Gen. Stats. § 7A-30(2) (1969) because of the dissent of Judge Hedrick.

In their brief filed in this Court defendants succinctly state the question for review as follows:

“Where an employee suffers a fracture of his wrist and as a result of the surgical reduction of the fracture he sustains scars of the forearm, is he entitled to be paid compensation for permanent partial disability and in addition for disfigurement under G.S. 97-31?”

The facts in this case are fully set out and discussed in the opinion of the Court of Appeals. The following brief summary will…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Liles v. Charles Lee Byrd Logging Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  2. Collins v. Columbia Carolina Corp.North Carolina Industrial Commission · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API