Legal Opinion

Tunison v. Harper

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 15, 2010No. S09A1964PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUNSTEIN, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from the denial of injunctive relief sought by appellants, D.C. Tunison, Mary Tunison and Arlene Tunison, to protect their riparian rights to a 20-acre woods pond1 situated on their property and that of adjacent property owner, appellee Terry Harper. This petition was filed after appellee, a farmer who uses the pond to irrigate crops on his property, increased the amount of land he irrigates from about five acres to 40-45 acres. Appellants asserted that appellee’s action lowers the water table, killing the fish and preventing their aesthetic enjoyment…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pittman v. Harbin Clinic Professional AssociationSupreme Court of Georgia · 1993
  2. Redfearn v. Huntcliff Homes Ass'n, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1999
  3. Harris v. BrooksSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1955
  4. Pyle v. GilbertSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  5. Stewart v. BridgesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Carla Jones v. James MorrisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
  2. Jones v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
  3. Tunison v. HarperSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API