Legal Opinion
Cohen v. Wallace & Minchenberg
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 17, 2007PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for legal malpractice, the defendants Wallace & Minchenberg, Fred Wallace, individually and as a member of Wallace & Minchenberg, and Alfred Minchenberg, individually and as a member of Wallace & Minchenberg, appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Knipel, J.), dated February 2, 2005, as denied that branch of their motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the first and second causes of action in the complaint insofar as asserted against them, and the plaintiff cross-appeals from so much of the same…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Logalbo v. PlishkinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Tal-Spons Corp. v. NurnbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Farmer v. Central Elevator, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Kahn v. HartAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Petro v. New York Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Barnett v. SchwartzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Lamanna v. Pearson & ShapiroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Teodorescu v. BinderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- McCord v. Jaspan Schlesinger Hoffman, LLP (In Re Monahan Ford Corp. of Flushing)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 2008
- Baker, Sanders, Barshay, Grossman, Fass, Muhlstock & Neuwirth, LLC v. Comprehensive Mental Assessment & Medical Care, P.C.New York Supreme Court · 2010