Legal Opinion

Petsas Et Ux. v. O'Grady

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 24, 1928PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBuford, J.

In this case the appellee sought to foreclose a mortgage given to secure an original indebtedness of $2,000.00. It was alleged in the bill of complaint that $500.00 had been paid on the original indebtedness and that there was at the time of the institution of suit due and owing on said note the sum of $1,500.00 as principal, with interest from date to the date of the filing of the bill. The decree, however, required the defendants to pay the full sum of $2,000.00 as principal, together with interest and attorney’s fees.

It is admitted on brief in behalf of the appellee that the decree should…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ringling Joint Venture v. HUNTINGTON NAT. BK.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API