Legal Opinion

Boyd v. Miller

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 15, 1914No. Appeal, No. 17PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal, No. 17, Jan. T., 1914, by plaintiff, from decree of C. P. Luzerne Co., Oct. T., 1912, No.'2, dismissing bill in equity in case of Ira Boyd et al. v. William F. Miller. Bill in equity for an injunction. Before Strauss, J. The opinion, of the Superior Court states the case. Error assigned was decree dismissing the bill.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Trexler, J.,

Plaintiffs brought a bill in equity to restrain the defendant from trespassing over a narrow strip of land which they claimed to own and which strip defendant must cross if he wishes to have access to a public road.

The question in the case is, does this narrow strip of land belong to the plaintiffs, with the right of possession, or is it embraced within the lines of the public road? The court found the strip was included in the road and dismissed the bill.

There are nineteen assignments of error. They need not be considered separately. We need only determine whether the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Furniss v. FurnissSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1857
  2. Commonwealth v. JacksonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
  3. Commonwealth v. Plymouth TownshipSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1902

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lenhart v. WrightSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  2. Penn Cigar Co. v. FriedbergSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API