Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Robb v. Poelker

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 15, 1974No. 58563PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINCH, Judge.

This is an original proceeding in mandamus wherein certain officials of the State of Missouri as relators seek to compel officials of the City of St. Louis as respondents to budget, appropriate and pay sums allegedly due under the provisions of § 202.863 RSMo 1969, V.A.M.S.1 for care and maintenance in state institutions of indigent patients from the City of St. Louis. We issued our alternative writ of mandamus to which respondents have filed their return. We now order issuance of a peremptory writ of mandamus.

Beginning with the fiscal year commencing May 1, 1971, and continuing…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gill v. County of BuchananSupreme Court of Missouri · 1940
  2. State Ex Rel. Williamson v. County Court of Barry CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
  3. State ex rel. Hall v. BaumanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1971

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Missouri Highway & Transportation Commission v. McCannMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Cox v. Ripley CountyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Opinion No. (1985), Missouri Attorney General Reports1985
  4. Opinion No. (1986), Missouri Attorney General Reports1986
  5. Opinion No. (1991), Missouri Attorney General Reports1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API