Legal Opinion

Oriental Refining Co. v. Hallenbeck

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 21, 1952No. 16562PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Clark

The parties to this cause will herein be designated as they appeared in the trial court, where defendant in error was plaintiff and plaintiff in error was defendant.

The action is one for recovery of rental, allegedly past due, pursuant to the provisions of a written lease of property owned by plaintiff and located in the City and County of Denver. The lease is on a printed form commonly used, bears date the 6th day of November, 1947, and was to run for a period of three years from and including the 1st day of December, 1947, at an agreed rental of $12,600, payable in installments of $350 per…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Swanson v. MartinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1949
  2. Gonzales v. ChinnSupreme Court of Colorado · 1949
  3. House v. SmithSupreme Court of Colorado · 1947
  4. Freeman v. Boyer Bros.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1927

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hauck v. Second National Bank of RichmondIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. Gardner v. City of EnglewoodSupreme Court of Colorado · 1955
  3. McGuire v. LuckenbachSupreme Court of Colorado · 1955
  4. Light v. RogersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1952
  5. Graham v. AndersonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API