Legal Opinion

People v. Finkelstein

New York Court of Special Session

Decided July 25, 1961PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJames Randall Creel, J.

While these cases were not tried together, the issues of law in each are the same, the facts are very similar, and these eases on prior trials and appeals have *772been reported together. Hence, this decision will apply to each of these three eases.

Each of the defendants is charged in separate informations with violation of section 1141 of the Penal Law in that they did sell or have in their possession with the intent to sell certain specified books which are alleged to be obscene.

In the Finkelstein and the Schaeffer eases, which by stipulation were tried together, Detective Dell testified as to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Smith v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Winters v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. People v. SchenkmanNew York Court of Special Session · 1960

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  2. People v. FinkelsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
  3. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API