Legal Opinion · Dissent

Kuhn v. Camelot Ass'n

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 25, 2011No. Appeal No. 2Published

1Dissent

Smith, J.P., and Garni, J.

(dissenting in part). We respectfully dissent in part. In our view, Supreme Court erred in granting plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment on liability with respect to the Labor Law § 240 (1) claim upon granting defendant’s motion for leave to reargue, inter alia, its opposition to plaintiffs motion. Defendant raised a triable issue of fact whether plaintiffs own conduct was the sole proximate cause of his injuries. The record establishes that, on the date of his accident, plaintiff was employed by nonparty Watkins Builders, Inc. (Watkins Builders) to perform…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Montgomery v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATIONNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. Rico-Castro v. Do & Co New York Catering, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  3. Pichardo v. Aurora Contractors, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  4. Harris v. Hueber-Breuer Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  5. Gimeno v. American Signature, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API