Legal Opinion

Garlock, Inc. v. Latham

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided November 1, 1995No. 27526-CAPublished

1Opinion of the Court

JjMARVIN, Chief Judge.

In this action on an open account first instituted against “Gary T. Latham F/D/B/A Lateo Pump & Supply Co., Inc.,” in 1993, and amended in 1994 to name Gary D. Latham F/D/B/A Lateo Pump & Supply Co., Inc., in the alternative as the defendant, Gary T. Latham appeals a summary judgment that was granted and signed, but not for the amount sued for, on plaintiffs motion after Gary T. Latham was served in 1994 and answered with a general denial, raising no affirmative defenses.1 The record does not show that Gary D. Latham was served.

We reverse the summary judgment and remand.

D…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Shrader v. Life General SEC. Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1991
  2. Metro Communications, Inc. v. CallenLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API