Phy v. Hatfield
Tennessee Supreme Court
FROM PUTNAM. Appeal from tbe Chancery Court of Putnam County. —D. L. Lansdbn, Chancellor.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Neid
delivered tile opinion of tbe Court.
This is an ejectment suit brought by the complainant to recover eleven and one-half acres of land in Putnam county which he claims under a grant issued to him by the State on the 9th day of May, 1881. The defendants claim under a grant issued by the State to Celina Pish on the 24th of September, 1827, and by a regular chain of conveyances from the heirs of Celina Fisk to J. Arnold, and from the latter -to the defendants.
It is insisted by the complainant that this title was abandoned before Arnold procured deeds from the heirs of Celina Fisk. This contention…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Barrett v. Kansas & Texas Coal Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1905
- Woods v. BonnerTennessee Supreme Court · 1890
- Kreamer v. YoneidaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
- Hoffman v. BellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1869
- Bear Valley Coal Co. v. DewartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1880
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Griffis v. Davidson County Metropolitan GovernmentTennessee Supreme Court · 2005
- Anson v. TietzeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1945
- Southern Coal & Iron Co. v. SchwoonTennessee Supreme Court · 1921
- Cottrell v. DanielCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1947
- Dyer v. SianoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.