Legal Opinion

Springs v. . Schenck

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1888PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The following is a copy of the material part of the case settled on appeal:

The plaintiff brought his action to recover the land described in the complaint, and, in order to establish his title and right of possession, he introduced a deed made in 1868, by one Phelps to S. F. Rothchild, and then a deed made in 1883, by S. F. Rothchild, to himself. He introduced witnesses, who testified that each of these deeds covers the land in dispute.

He then introduced other witnesses, whose evidence tended to show, that the defendant Schenck had leased the land in dispute, from an agent of Phelps', prior…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Whitesides v. . CooperSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
  2. Bonds v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  3. Cable v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  4. Abbott and Foster v. . CromartieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1875
  5. Collins v. . SwansonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Lawrence v. . EllerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  2. Timber Co. v. . YarbroughSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
  3. Clinkscales v. Wisconsin Granite Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Buckhorn Land & Timber Co. v. YarbroughSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
  5. Sipe v. . HermanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API