Legal Opinion

Brown v. Cheatham

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided January 9, 1892PublishedCited by 6 opinions

PROM MAURY. Appeal in error from Chancery Court of Maury County. A. J. AberNAThy, Ch.

1Opinion of the CourtLurtoN, J.

This is a bill of ejectment. Complainant claims as heir at law of Addison Denton, colored. Defendants claim that Addison died without heirs at law, and that under § 3272, Code of (M. & V.), the property descended to his- widow, Sylvester Denton, from whom they purchased and under whom they claim. The title depends upon the validity of the marriage of Rachel, the mother of complainant, to the intestate, Addison.

Under the statute a jury was called, and issues of fact submitted for their determination. The jury found that- the marriage of' Rachel to Denton was valid, and that complainant was the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Overseers of the Poor of Marbletown v. Overseers of the Poor of KingstonNew York Supreme Court · 1822

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Carver v. MaxwellTennessee Supreme Court · 1902
  2. In Re Estate of McDadeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  3. Adams v. SneedSupreme Court of Florida · 1899
  4. Lee v. LeeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1901
  5. Wallace v. BerryCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API