Legal Opinion

Shy v. Navistar Int'l Corp

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided April 14, 2021No. 3:92-cv-00333Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION ART SHY, et al., Plaintiffs, ‘Case No. 3:92-cv-0333 V. JUDGE WALTER H. RICE NAVISTAR INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, et. al., Defendants. DECISION AND ENTRY OVERRULING PHASE | OF DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO REFORM THE 1993 CONSENT DECREE BASED ON NAVISTAR’S CURRENT FINANCIAL STANDING AND THE EVOLUTION OF THE HEALTHCARE MARKETPLACE (DOC. #537), INCLUDING FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW; ENTIRETY OF MOTION TO REFORM (DOC. #537) OVERRULED Defendants, Navistar International Corporation and Navistar, Inc.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Rufo v. Inmates of Suffolk County JailSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Horne v. FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. Northeast Ohio Coalition for the Homeless v. HustedCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  5. Vanguards of Cleveland v. City of ClevelandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API