Legal Opinion
Pearson v. Salt Lake County
Utah Supreme Court
Decided November 2, 1959No. 9042PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WADE, Justice.
Plaintiffs seek to have declared invalid the creation and operation of Special Improvement District No. 1, of Salt Lake County. They claim it violates the laws and Constitution of this State and of the United States. The creation and operation of this *391District were under Chapter 7, Title 17, U.C.A.1953, as amended by the Laws of Utah for 1957, which repealed the existing sections and enacted new sections. Plaintiffs also ask for injunctive relief. The trial court found no merit to their claims and plaintiffs appeal. They argue nine grounds for reversal.
Plaintiffs are residents…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Davidson v. New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Hagar v. Reclamation District No. 108Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Lillard v. MeltonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1915
- American Co. v. City of LakeportCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Bellingham Bay & British Columbia RailRoad v. New WhatcomSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Conrad v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Wagner v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1972
- STATE EX REL. COUNCIL OF CHARLESTON v. HallWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1994
- Branch v. SALT LAKE CO SERV. A. NO. 2-COTTONWOOD HTS.Utah Supreme Court · 1969
- Branch v. Salt Lake County Service Area No. 2-Cottonwood HeightsUtah Supreme Court · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.