Varner v. Eppley

The plaintiff in error ■ claims that there was prejudicial error committed in the trial of this case in its submission to the jury; that the court erred in its general charge, in that it failed to charge the jury properly as to the law of the case, and also omitted to charge the jury as to many features of the case. The plaintiff in error also contends that the verdict of the jury was contrary to and against the manifest weight of the evidence, and was unquestionably the result of passion and prejudice.

Referring to the last claimed ground of error, after a careful examination of the recor.d…