Legal Opinion

Videobox Networks v. Durst

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 25, 1999Published

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Alfred Toker, J.H.O.), entered on or about February 10, 1998, which, in an action to recover for damages to plaintiff’s building allegedly caused by construction work to defendants’ adjacent building, denied plaintiff’s motion to adjourn the trial, “supplement” its amended bill of particulars and file additional expert witness disclosure, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

*430Plaintiffs eve-of-trial motion to change its theory of damages from lost rental income and cost of repair to reduced rental value was properly denied on the ground that the delay in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Haagen-Dazs Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. Boland v. KoppelmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API