Legal Opinion
Lemay v. Furtado
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided November 25, 1902PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, C. J.
This is a bill in equity to restrain the defendant from continuous trespassing upon a strip of land to the northeast of the defendant’s land. The plaintiff claims title to the strip. The defendant also claims title to the whole or a part of the strip, or at least a right of way over the whole of it. In the Superior Court the bill was dismissed on the master’s report, and the case comes here by appeal.
We shall address ourselves only to the merits of the case, as the parties have done. Those depend on the construction of a *281deed from one Brightman to one Brigham, his son-in-law, of the land now…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Durkin v. CobleighMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
- Crocker v. CottingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896
- Peck v. DennistonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
- Boland v. St. John's SchoolsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
- Dean v. City of LowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Murphy v. Mart Realty of Brockton, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
- Gorton-Pew Fisheries Co. v. TolmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
- Casella v. SneiersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
- Erickson v. AmesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
- McKenzie v. GleasonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.