Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Phelps v. Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 27, 1962No. Gen. 48,581Published

1Concurrence

ENGLISH, J.,

specially concurring:

I agree with the majority’s application of the principle of relation-back, and its consequent determination that there are, in this case, a valid contract and a valid attorney’s lien. I, therefore, concur in the conclusion that the trial court’s order striking respondent’s answer should be reversed and the cause remanded. I disagree, however, as to the directions for further proceedings upon remandment.

Since plaintiff’s petition denied the existence of a valid contract with Arnold, it cannot be said with certainty that the cause is at issue on the pleadings.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Baker v. BakerIllinois Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Goldberg v. PerlmutterAppellate Court of Illinois · 1941
  3. McKeown v. PridmoreAppellate Court of Illinois · 1941
  4. Mid-City Trust & Savings Bank v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1937
  5. Smith v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API