Phelps v. Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Co.
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Concurrence
ENGLISH, J.,
specially concurring:
I agree with the majority’s application of the principle of relation-back, and its consequent determination that there are, in this case, a valid contract and a valid attorney’s lien. I, therefore, concur in the conclusion that the trial court’s order striking respondent’s answer should be reversed and the cause remanded. I disagree, however, as to the directions for further proceedings upon remandment.
Since plaintiff’s petition denied the existence of a valid contract with Arnold, it cannot be said with certainty that the cause is at issue on the pleadings.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Baker v. BakerIllinois Supreme Court · 1913
- Goldberg v. PerlmutterAppellate Court of Illinois · 1941
- McKeown v. PridmoreAppellate Court of Illinois · 1941
- Mid-City Trust & Savings Bank v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1937
- Smith v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1942