Legal Opinion

Hurdt v. Courtenay

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided January 23, 1862PublishedCited by 3 opinions

CASE 20 — PETITION EQUITY cited Rev. Slat., chap. 40,secs. 1 and 2. cited Rev. Stat., chap. 40, secs. 1 and 2; Story's Equity, chap. 7; 3 Johns. ch.R., 500.

1Opinion of the Court

JUDGE PETERS

delivered the opinion op the court:

In April, 1860, the appellant, Hurdt, recovered a judgment in the court of common pleas for the county of St. Louis, State of Missouri, against Kennett McKenzie, for the sum of $912 28, upon which he caused an execution to issue in said month of April, 1860, and placed it in the hands of appellee, Thomas E. Courtenay, who was then the acting sheriff of said county, duly commissioned and qualified. Said execution was returnable to the November term, 1860, of said court.

Before or about the 1st of August, 1860, Courtenay collected the money upon…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bowling & Boucher v. Winslow's Adm'r.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1844

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Camp v. ChamberlainNew York Supreme Court · 1848
  2. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Brooks' Adm'xCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1885
  3. Sproul v. ReedCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1880

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API