Legal Opinion

City of Bowling Green v. Lynn

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 24, 2006No. WD-05-077Published

1Opinion of the Court

Parish, Judge.

{¶ 1} This is an appeal from a judgment of the Bowling Green Municipal Court granting appellee’s motion to suppress, and ruling that the officer lacked reasonable, articulable suspicion to support a traffic stop of appellee. For the reasons set forth below, the trial court judgment is reversed and remanded.

{¶ 2} On appeal, appellant sets forth a single assignment of error:

{¶ 3} “The trial court erred in granting the appellee’s motion to suppress as there was reasonable articulable suspicion to stop the appellee’s vehicle.”

{¶ 4} The following undisputed facts are relevant to the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. Godwin, Unpublished Decision (6-24-2005)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API