Casteel v. Anderson

The second special ground of the motion is expressly abandoned. In special ground three, the movant complains of the admission in evidence of a drawing, representing the highway and the successive- positions of the defendants’ truck and the plaintiff’s bicycle before and after the collision, over the objection that the drawing was not a true picture of what happened, was not drawn by the witness, and had the effect of leading the witness. It appears that the defendant Hillhouse testified as follows with regard to the drawing in question: “I note the little drawing which you exhibit to me, and…