Legal Opinion
In re the Estate of Harris
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided September 4, 1957PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Maximilian Moss, S.
This is an application by an insurance company, which insured decedent’s life, for leave to sue the temporary administrators herein. The policy was by its terms payable to the executors, administrators or assigns of the decedent. The purpose of instituting such suit is to interplead the administrators in an action presently pending against the company in the Supreme Court, Kings County. The plaintiff therein is the former wife of the decedent and the insurance company is one of three defendants; the other two defendants are a bank and “ The Estate of Joseph Harris,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Pouch v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Rosen v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietyNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
- Williamsburgh Savings Bank v. BernsteinNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
- Boden v. ArnsteinNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
- Clark v. ChildsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance v. LloydDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1961