Legal Opinion

Heath v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 12, 1944No. 4354PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKnox, J.

Prom a judgment entered in conformity with a verdict finding him guilty of embezzlement appellant prosecutes this appeal.

The evidence, when we view it, as we must, in the light most favorable to the state, discloses that the prosecuting witness, Jim Powell, and his wife, reside, and at all times mentioned have resided, in Lafayette, county, about eight miles north of Lewisville. In January, 1942, appellant came to their home, and-represented himself to be a wealthy oil man from Texas, who owned interests in several wells, a refinery and, also, owned a large place on the Gulf Coast. Declaring…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Wallis v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1891
  2. Hall v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
  3. Compton v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
  4. Gurley v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
  5. Kent v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Chaviers v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  2. State v. HannaOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Cassady v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
  4. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1952
  5. State v. HannaOregon Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API