Legal Opinion · Dissent

Anderson v. 50 East 72nd Street Condominium

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 10, 1986Published

1Dissent

Asch, J. P.

(dissenting). The majority has taken the position that the "right of first refusal” involved in this appeal is valid. *80I disagree. I read the cases in New York as supporting my view. It is quite clear, however, that the final legal answer must come from the Court of Appeals or the Legislature. Since I believe that there are significant public policy considerations which support the position I have taken, I dissent.

By its ruling in Metropolitan Transp. Auth. v Bruken Realty Corp. (67 NY2d 165), the Court of Appeals has described the circumstances under which it chooses not to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Shelley v. KraemerSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Metropolitan Transportation Authority v. Bruken Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. McMinn v. Town of Oyster BayNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. In re the Estate of WalkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Buffalo Seminary v. McCarthyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API