Legal Opinion

Turner v. Barraud

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided January 14, 1904PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from a decree of the Circuit Court of Norfolk county in a suit in chancery, wherein the appellants were the complainants, and the appellees were the defendants.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

D. C. Barraud, Senior, of the city of Norfolk, died in 1867, leaving a will, by which he gave to his grandson, D. 0. Barraud, Junior, a life estate in the “Barrons” farm in Norfolk county, with remainder to his lawful issue, if he should die leaving any, and if he should die without lawful issue then such remainder to pass, under the residuary clause of the will, to the persons there named. In addition to this specific bequest, the testator gave to this grandson an undivided interest in the estate passing under the residuary clause of his will.

Upon the death of the testator, the life tenant…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Windsor v. McVeighSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Galpin v. PageSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  3. Bigelow v. ForrestSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  4. Anthony v. KaseySupreme Court of Virginia · 1887
  5. Seamster v. BlackstockSupreme Court of Virginia · 1887

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Moses v. AkersSupreme Court of Virginia · 1961
  2. Moore v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1919
  3. Catron v. BosticSupreme Court of Virginia · 1918
  4. Harris v. DealSupreme Court of Virginia · 1949
  5. Gaddess v. Horris' ExecutorsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1904

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API