Legal Opinion

Fall River Canning Co. v. Department of Taxation

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 1958PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBroadfoot, J.

The appellant claims the right to offset the net business losses of the four corporations that were merged with it, under the provisions of sec. 71.06, Stats. That section provides that if a taxpayer sustains a net business loss such loss may be offset against the net business income of the taxpayer the following year, and if not all used during the next fiscal year the remainder of such business loss may be offset against the income of the taxpayer the next following year.

The issue to be decided is whether the Fall River Canning-Company is the taxpayer that sustained the net business loss…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Libson Shops, Inc., v. Koehler, District Director of Internal RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Rochester Railway Co. v. City of RochesterSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  3. United States v. Seattle-First National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Comet Co. v. Department of TaxationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Wisconsin Electric Power Co. v. Department of TaxationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1947

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Richard's Auto City, Inc. v. Director, Division of TaxationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  2. Ramrod, Inc. v. Department of RevenueWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Hall Chevrolet Co., Inc. v. Dept. of RevenueWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Moore Motor Freight Lines, Inc. v. Department of TaxationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Wisconsin Department of Revenue v. Caterpillar, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API