Legal Opinion

Hunt v. Scheer

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided December 21, 1976No. 49062Published

1Opinion of the Court

ROMANG, Judge:

This suit was brought to recover damages suffered by plaintiffs as a result of Kathryn A. Hunt being bitten by a dog owned and kept by the defendants, Robert A. Scheer and Patricia A. Scheer, husband and wife. Trial of this case before a jury resulted in a verdict and judgment for the defendants. Plaintiffs, Walter S. Hunt and Kathryn A. Hunt, husband and wife, have appealed.

The sole question for decision is whether there was evidence that defendants’ dog was provoked to bite and injure Mrs. Hunt within the meaning of the term “provocation” as used in 4 O.S.1971, § 42.1, which…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Nelson v. LewisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  2. Messa v. SullivanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965
  3. Aetna Life Insurance Co. v. MosburgSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API