Johnson v. Golden Triangle Corporation
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WILSON, Justice.
The lessor, Golden Triangle, recovered judgment for rents in a non-jury trial against Philco as alleged assignee of the original lessee, Johnson. Findings and conclusions were filed. We affirm.
Philco’s principal contention concerning the rent claim is that there is no showing in the record that it became an assignee so as to be liable for rents. Golden Triangle leased the premises to Johnson for a five-year term by written agreement, to be used for a coin-operated dry cleaning and laundry business. Philco furnished the equipment and financed the operation, called a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Davis v. VidalTexas Supreme Court · 1912
- Womack v. WomackTexas Supreme Court · 1943
- Rohrt v. Kelley Manufacturing CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1961
- Jackson v. KnightCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
- Cooper v. AstinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961
3Cited by4 opinions
- Twelve Oaks Tower I, Ltd. v. Premier Allergy, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1997
- Schecter v. FolsomCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
- Taco Boy, Inc. v. Redelco Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Trient Partners I, Ltd. v. Blockbuster Entertainment Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1996