Legal Opinion · Dissent

State ex rel. Roberts v. McConville

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 13, 1990No. SC S37465Published

1DissentFadeley, J.

A circuit court judge has enjoined the state’s chief election officer from providing information to the voters which a statute plainly mandates that voters receive before they vote whether initiative or referendum proposals shall become state law. The statutory mandate provides that the information “shall be printed in the Voters’ Pamphlet and on the ballot unless the measure involves only administrative expenses not exceeding $50,000 per year.” (Emphasis added.) The circuit judge’s decision provides that:

“[S]uch financial impact statements may not be printed in the voter’s pamphlet or on the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Bunn v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State Ex Rel. Anderson v. PaulusOregon Supreme Court · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API