Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Lynch v. Lynch

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided September 24, 1945No. 35905Published

1Concurrence

PARTIALLY CONCURRING OPINION.

Barry Dexter Lynch, a minor, and his mother, each own an interest in this land with the right of possession; consequently it is subject to partition between them. Whether this partition is binding on those to whom the interest of Barry Dexter will go in the event he should die before becoming twenty-one years of age, can be determined when, but not unless and until, that event happens and they thereby become entitled to the possession of the land and institute another action for another partition thereof. Black v. Washington, 65 Miss. 60, 3 So. 140; Lawson v.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lynch v. LynchMississippi Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Black v. WashingtonMississippi Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Lawson v. BonnerMississippi Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Bland v. BlandMississippi Supreme Court · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API