Johnson v. MICHELIN NORTH AMERICA
District Court, D. South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
R. BRYAN HARWELL, District Judge.
Pending before the court are the parties’ cross-motions for judgment. The parties entered into a Joint Stipulation agreeing to certain relevant facts and the applicable standard of review. The parties also agreed that the court may dispose of this matter based upon cross-motions for judgment. 1
Procedural Overview
Pursuant to the Joint Stipulations agreed to by the parties, Plaintiff has asserted: 1) a claim for benefits under ERISA § 502(a)(1)(B), 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(1)(B); 2) a claim for breach of fiduciary duty under ERISA § 502(a)(3), 29…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- James P. Cotton, Jr. v. Massachusetts Mutual LifeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- Ellen v. Ellis v. Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
- Smith v. SydnorCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- B. v. BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF NORTH CAROLINADistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2025
- Smith v. Michelin Tire CorporationDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2022