Legal Opinion

Johnson v. MICHELIN NORTH AMERICA

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided September 11, 2009No. 6:08-cr-00055PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

R. BRYAN HARWELL, District Judge.

Pending before the court are the parties’ cross-motions for judgment. The parties entered into a Joint Stipulation agreeing to certain relevant facts and the applicable standard of review. The parties also agreed that the court may dispose of this matter based upon cross-motions for judgment. 1

Procedural Overview

Pursuant to the Joint Stipulations agreed to by the parties, Plaintiff has asserted: 1) a claim for benefits under ERISA § 502(a)(1)(B), 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(1)(B); 2) a claim for breach of fiduciary duty under ERISA § 502(a)(3), 29…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  3. James P. Cotton, Jr. v. Massachusetts Mutual LifeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
  4. Ellen v. Ellis v. Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
  5. Smith v. SydnorCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. B. v. BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF NORTH CAROLINADistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2025
  2. Smith v. Michelin Tire CorporationDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API