Legal Opinion

Belmont Iron Works v. Pacific Coast Direct Line, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 27, 1936PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtUntermyer, J.

The action is to recover a sum claimed to have been wrongfully collected by the defendant as freight for the transportation of structural steel consigned by the plaintiff from Chester, Pa., to Pearl Harbor, Hawaii. In May, 1934, the plaintiff wrote to Sobelman & Co., the defendant’s Philadelphia agents, requesting a rate on such a shipment. Sobelman & Co. communicated with the defendant, which, by letter of May 24, 1934, quoted a rate of nine dollars and eighty cents per ton of two thousand pounds or forty cubic feet, “ at steamer’s option.” Sobelman & Co. thereupon wrote to the plaintiff…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fé Railway Co. v. HefleySupreme Court of the United States · 1895

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dampskibsselskabet Torm A/S v. P. L. Thomas Paper Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
  2. Sands v. Calmar Steamship Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Dampskibsselskabet Torm A/S v. P. L. Thomas Paper Co.New York Supreme Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API