Legal Opinion

Village of Wauconda v. Hutton

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 16, 1997No. 2-96-1307PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bowman

Plaintiff, the Village of Wauconda, charged defendant, George N. Hutton IV, with operating a windsurfer (sailboard) without a personal flotation device (Village of Wauconda Code § 8—8—31(C) (amended May 21, 1996)). Defendant orally moved to dismiss, arguing that plaintiffs ordinance was inconsistent with state statutes regulating the use of personal flotation devices (PFDs). Plaintiff filed a written response. Following a bench trial, the court granted judgment for defendant, finding that the ordinance was inconsistent with and preempted by state law. Plaintiff appeals, and we affirm.

At the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. First Capitol Mortgage Corp. v. Talandis Construction Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Kraft, Inc. v. EdgarIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
  3. In Re Application for Judgment & Sale of Delinquent PropertiesIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
  4. T & S SIGNS, INC. v. Village of WadsworthAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  5. Village of Mundelein v. HartnettAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Village of Sugar Grove v. RichAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  2. People Ex Rel. Ryan v. Village of Hanover ParkAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  3. Hawthorne v. Village of Olympia FieldsAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
  4. County of Cook v. Village of BridgeviewAppellate Court of Illinois · 2014
  5. Englum v. City of CharlestonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2017

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API