Village of Wauconda v. Hutton
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bowman
Plaintiff, the Village of Wauconda, charged defendant, George N. Hutton IV, with operating a windsurfer (sailboard) without a personal flotation device (Village of Wauconda Code § 8—8—31(C) (amended May 21, 1996)). Defendant orally moved to dismiss, arguing that plaintiffs ordinance was inconsistent with state statutes regulating the use of personal flotation devices (PFDs). Plaintiff filed a written response. Following a bench trial, the court granted judgment for defendant, finding that the ordinance was inconsistent with and preempted by state law. Plaintiff appeals, and we affirm.
At the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- First Capitol Mortgage Corp. v. Talandis Construction Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1976
- Kraft, Inc. v. EdgarIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
- In Re Application for Judgment & Sale of Delinquent PropertiesIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
- T & S SIGNS, INC. v. Village of WadsworthAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
- Village of Mundelein v. HartnettAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Village of Sugar Grove v. RichAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
- People Ex Rel. Ryan v. Village of Hanover ParkAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
- Hawthorne v. Village of Olympia FieldsAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
- County of Cook v. Village of BridgeviewAppellate Court of Illinois · 2014
- Englum v. City of CharlestonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2017
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.