Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. Bakem Credit Union

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 22, 1973No. 73-75PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

George Rose Smith, Justice.

The appellee brought this action upon a $750 promissory note executed by the appellant Reynolds and by a co-maker whose debts have been discharged in bankruptcy. Reynolds has not denied his liability for the principal amount of the note. He did, however, file a counterclaim, individually and as the asserted class representative of other borrowers from the plaintiff, asserting that the plaintiff had violated the Truth in Lending Law, 15 U.S.C.A. § 1639, by failing to disclose the amount of its finance charges and its annual percentage rate. This appeal is from an…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tucker v. Pulaski Federal Savings & Loan AssociationSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
  2. Miles v. N. J. MotorsOhio Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. Reader v. Magma-Superior Copper CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Corey v. Mercantile Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1944

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Purser v. Corpus Christi State National BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
  2. Bell v. Beneficial Consumer Discount Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Hortonv. City of ParagouldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API