Reynolds v. Bakem Credit Union
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
George Rose Smith, Justice.
The appellee brought this action upon a $750 promissory note executed by the appellant Reynolds and by a co-maker whose debts have been discharged in bankruptcy. Reynolds has not denied his liability for the principal amount of the note. He did, however, file a counterclaim, individually and as the asserted class representative of other borrowers from the plaintiff, asserting that the plaintiff had violated the Truth in Lending Law, 15 U.S.C.A. § 1639, by failing to disclose the amount of its finance charges and its annual percentage rate. This appeal is from an…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Tucker v. Pulaski Federal Savings & Loan AssociationSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
- Miles v. N. J. MotorsOhio Court of Appeals · 1972
- Reader v. Magma-Superior Copper CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1972
- Corey v. Mercantile Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1944
3Cited by3 opinions
- Purser v. Corpus Christi State National BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
- Bell v. Beneficial Consumer Discount Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Hortonv. City of ParagouldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974