Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Jones v. Wilkinson

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided September 8, 1986No. 85-2157Published

1Concurrence

BALDOCK, Circuit Judge,

specially concurring.

The per curiam opinion affirms the judgment on the basis of the district court’s opinion. Community Television of Utah, Inc. v. Wilkinson, 611 F.Supp. 1099 (D. Utah 1985). Although precedent compels me to agree that the Utah Cable Television Programming Decency Act (Cable Decency Act), Utah Code Ann. §§ 76-10-1701 to 76-10-1708 (1986 Supp.) is both vague and overbroad, I respectfully find that the Cable Decency Act does not withstand constitutional challenge on somewhat different and narrower grounds than the district court. I write separately…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API