Goldin v. Tauster

Plaintiff bought- the defendant’s drug store, giving him in part payment of the consideration several promissory notes. Plaintiff claims that the defendant was guilty of deceit in representing the amount of business done in the store, and has brought an action for damages for such alleged deceit. Plaintiff now moves for an injunction pendente Ute to restrain the defendant from negotiating the notes.

The complaint does not ask for a delivery up and cancellation of the notes, but confines itself in the prayer for relief to money damages.

It is clear that section 603 of the Code of Civil…