Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Reynolds v. Reynolds

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 1919No. 1136Published

Appeal from Circuit Judge, First Circuit. Hon. C. W. Ashford, Judge.

1Concurrence

CONCURRING OPINION OF

COKE, C. J.

I concur in the opinion of Mr. Justice Edings but confess that I entertain little sympathy for the rule announced upon the first ground of demurrer. It is a rule based upon the fiction of complete .unity of husband and wife and because of which they cannot contract with or sue each other since a person cannot make a contract or bring a suit against himself. In some of the States this obsolete fiction has been abolished by statute, thus emancipating both spouses from its consequences. This, however', has not been done in Hawaii. In fact the ancient rule denying…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lewis v. ElrodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1861
  2. Bridges v. McKennaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1859
  3. Walter ex rel. Purdy v. WalterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1871
  4. Decker & Tyson v. MllerNew York Court of Chancery · 1830
  5. Dewall v. CovenhovenNew York Court of Chancery · 1836

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API