Legal Opinion

Ford Motor Co. v. Helms

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided December 20, 1938No. 95PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BYERS, District Judge.

This is a motion for a temporary injunction touching the display by defendants of a large vertical neon sign over the street in front of their building, reading “Ford” in block letters; extending laterally and inward therefrom in letters somewhat smaller is the word “Repairs”. Whether the latter addition is a neon sign does not clearly appear, although the moving affidavit says “the qualifying words cannot be illuminated at night”.

Under the word “Repairs” on the lateral arm, the sign contains the following: “We Repair Ford Cars And do not Act as Authorized Dealers.”

The…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft v. Douglas D. Church, Doing Business as Modern SpecialistCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  2. United States Surgical Corp. v. Orris, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1998
  3. Volkswagenwerk v. FrankDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1961
  4. Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft v. ChurchDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1966
  5. Union Tank Car Co. v. Lindsay Soft Water Corp. of Omaha, Inc.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API